A RoboCop, a park and a fight: How expectations about robots are clashing with reality

Exploring the tension between public expectations and the current capabilities of robots, as exemplified by a controversial incident in a park involving a RoCoP unit. Delving into the complexities of responsible AI governance, this article underscores the need for guardrails to ensure safe and secure AI deployment.

Matched TAIM controls

Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls

MAP 1.3 — similarity 0.509, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MAP 1.6 — similarity 0.508, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MAP 1.1 — similarity 0.506, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →

AI governance case studies

For forensic AI governance failure analysis (TAIMScore™ case studies), browse Human Signal’s Failure Files™.

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/77

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.