Cybercheck Tool Allegedly Provides Questionable Evidence in Murder Trials

May 3, 2024

Global Intelligence's Cybercheck AI tool, a popular choice among law enforcement for tracking suspects via open source data, has been under scrutiny for providing inaccurate or unverifiable evidence in multiple murder trials. The lack of transparency and reliability in the tool's reports has led to its findings being questioned, prompting prosecutors to withdraw Cybercheck evidence in several cases.

This incident underscores the need for safe and secure AI practices and raises questions about governance and accountability in the use of such tools. By contributing to Project Cerebellum's AI incident database, you can help us map incidents like this, measure their impact, and propose manageable solutions that promote trustworthy AI.

JOIN US

Matched TAIM controls

Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls

Alleged deployer
global-intelligence, cybercheck
Alleged developer
global-intelligence, cybercheck
Alleged harmed parties
phillip-mendoza, sergio-cerna, unnamed-aurora-colorado-residents, mississippi-bureau-of-investigation, four-unnamed-summit-county-ohio-men, unnamed-boulder-county-colorado-resident, ohio-bureau-of-criminal-investigation, yakima-county-sheriff's-office

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/823

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.