Cybercheck Tool Allegedly Provides Questionable Evidence in Murder Trials
May 3, 2024
This incident underscores the need for safe and secure AI practices and raises questions about governance and accountability in the use of such tools. By contributing to Project Cerebellum's AI incident database, you can help us map incidents like this, measure their impact, and propose manageable solutions that promote trustworthy AI.
JOIN US
Matched TAIM controls
Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls
- MEASURE 2.6 — similarity 0.674, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MEASURE 2.10 — similarity 0.669, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MAP 4.1 — similarity 0.667, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- Alleged deployer
- global-intelligence, cybercheck
- Alleged developer
- global-intelligence, cybercheck
- Alleged harmed parties
- phillip-mendoza, sergio-cerna, unnamed-aurora-colorado-residents, mississippi-bureau-of-investigation, four-unnamed-summit-county-ohio-men, unnamed-boulder-county-colorado-resident, ohio-bureau-of-criminal-investigation, yakima-county-sheriff's-office
Source
Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/823
Data source
Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).
When citing the database as a whole, please use:
McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.
Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide
We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.