Dutch City Court Defended Home Value Generated by Black-Box Algorithm

February 1, 2016

The Castricum court's decision to defend a home value generated by a black-box algorithm has sparked debate, with legal specialists cautioning about the potential dangers of accepting such algorithms without proper transparency and accountability mechanisms. This case underscores the need for safe and secure AI practices and emphasizes the importance of Project Cerebellum's efforts in establishing guardrails for trustworthy AI. For those interested in shaping the future of AI governance, JOIN US to learn more about HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM (Govern) and contribute to our AI incident database.

Map and measure such incidents to foster a harmonious coexistence between humans and AI.

Matched TAIM controls

Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls

MAP 4.1 — similarity 0.703, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MAP 1.6 — similarity 0.699, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MEASURE 2.6 — similarity 0.695, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →

Alleged deployer: castricum-municipality
Alleged developer: castricum-municipality
Alleged harmed parties: unnamed-property-owner

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/250

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.