Error-Prone AI Accessibility Tools Reportedly Lead to Navigation Issues for Blind Internet Users
April 7, 2024
Contribute to Project Cerebellum and help establish guardrails for AI that prioritize trustworthy and accessible experiences. Join us today at JOIN US.
This incident highlights the importance of the HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM's Measure function, emphasizing the necessity of evaluating and improving the accuracy of AI accessibility tools.
Matched TAIM controls
Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls
- MAP 1.6 — similarity 0.662, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MAP 4.1 — similarity 0.659, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MEASURE 2.6 — similarity 0.657, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- Alleged deployer
- zara, pemex, lvmh, capita, companies-using-ai-based-accessibility-tools
- Alleged developer
- equalweb, userway, developers-of-ai-based-accessibility-tools
- Alleged harmed parties
- blind-people, visually-impaired-people, jakob-rosin
Source
Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/830
Data source
Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).
When citing the database as a whole, please use:
McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.
Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide
We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.