ETS Used Allegedly Flawed Voice Recognition Evidence to Accuse and Assess Scale of Cheating, Causing Thousands to be Deported from the UK
January 1, 2014
This underscores the importance of trustworthy AI, safe and secure AI practices. For those interested in shaping the future of responsible AI governance, consider joining Project Cerebellum as we strive to map, measure, and manage such incidents through the HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM.
Matched TAIM controls
Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls
- MEASURE 2.6 — similarity 0.684, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MEASURE 2.10 — similarity 0.669, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MEASURE 4.2 — similarity 0.664, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- Alleged deployer
- ets
- Alleged developer
- ets
- Alleged harmed parties
- uk-ets-past-test-takers, uk-ets-test-takers, uk-home-office
Source
Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/162
Data source
Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).
When citing the database as a whole, please use:
McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.
Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide
We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.