Factum in Ko v. Li Allegedly Contains AI-Generated Case Law Citations

April 25, 2025

In the case of Ko v. Li, 2025 ONSC 2766, Justice FL Myers of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice raised concerns over potential use of generative AI in drafting a factum submission. The court identified several inaccurate or nonexistent case citations, leading to questions about their relevance and existence. The lawyer was ordered to show cause why she should not be cited for contempt, emphasizing the importance of accuracy and technological competence in AI-related practices. This incident underscores the need for trustworthy AI and responsible AI governance, as seen in Project Cerebellum's efforts towards safe and secure AI practices.

For those interested in shaping AI governance and mapping incidents like this to the HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM (Govern), JOIN US.

Matched TAIM controls

Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls

Alleged deployer
jisuh-lee
Alleged developer
unspecified-large-language-mode-developer
Alleged harmed parties
hanna-ko, jisuh-lee, ontario-superior-court-of-justice, legal-integrity

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/1099

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.