Gemini AI Allegedly Reads Google Drive Files Without Explicit User Consent
July 16, 2024
Google denies these allegations, insisting that Gemini operates only with proactive user activation and adheres to privacy-preserving settings. However, this incident highlights the importance of responsible AI governance and the need for safe and secure AI practices.
For those interested in shaping the future of trustworthy AI and ensuring its proper use, join us at HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM to Govern, Map, Measure, or Manage such incidents effectively. JOIN US
Matched TAIM controls
Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls
- MEASURE 2.10 — similarity 0.660, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MAP 1.6 — similarity 0.650, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MAP 4.1 — similarity 0.627, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- Alleged deployer
- google, gemini
- Alleged developer
- Alleged harmed parties
- kevin-bankston, google-users, google-drive-users
Source
Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/743
Data source
Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).
When citing the database as a whole, please use:
McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.
Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide
We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.