Hoodline Accused of Misleadingly Attributing AI-Generated Articles to Human Authors

May 31, 2024

In 2023, the news site Hoodline was accused of misleading readers by publishing AI-generated articles with falsified author attributions. These articles appeared to be written by human journalists, complete with bylines, headshots, and biographies. This clandestine practice raises concerns about transparency in AI journalism, potentially damaging public trust. The HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM seeks to address such issues and promote safe and secure AI practices.

For those interested in shaping the future of responsible AI governance, we invite you to JOIN US.

Matched TAIM controls

Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls

MAP 1.6 — similarity 0.638, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MEASURE 2.10 — similarity 0.632, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MAP 4.1 — similarity 0.627, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →

Alleged deployer: hoodline
Alleged developer: hoodline
Alleged harmed parties: hoodline-readers, journalism, general-public

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/749

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.