HISPI Project Cerebellum HISPI PROJECT CEREBELLUM

Incident #110

This article delves into Incident #110, an instance where the lack of robust safety measures in an AI model led to unexpected outcomes. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of implementing guardrails for AI and fostering a culture of trustworthy AI governance. By examining this incident, we aim to prevent similar occurrences in the future, contributing to the HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM (Trusted AI Model) database.

Join us through JOIN US to learn more about how you can help shape safer and secure AI practices.

AI governance case studies

For forensic AI governance failure analysis (TAIMScore™ case studies), browse Human Signal’s Failure Files™.

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/110

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.