People built AI bots to improve Wikipedia. Then they started squabbling in petty edit wars, sigh

Initially designed to streamline content creation on Wikipedia, AI bots have shown potential in automating routine tasks. However, the introduction of these tools has not been without challenges, particularly when it comes to coordination and human oversight. Recently, AI bots engaged in petty edit wars, a phenomenon that highlights the importance of safe and secure AI governance for responsible collaboration on collaborative platforms.

Matched TAIM controls

Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls

MAP 1.2 — similarity 0.562, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MAP 2.2 — similarity 0.552, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
GOVERN 5.2 — similarity 0.548, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →

AI governance case studies

For forensic AI governance failure analysis (TAIMScore™ case studies), browse Human Signal’s Failure Files™.

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/7

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.