Plaintiffs' Lawyers Admit AI Generated Erroneous Case Citations in Federal Court Filing Against Walmart
February 6, 2025
This incident underscores the need for responsible AI governance and trustworthy AI practices in the legal sector. It highlights the potential risks of relying solely on AI outputs without proper verification. For those interested in shaping safe and secure AI practices, join us at HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM to Govern, Map, Measure, or Manage such incidents and contribute to harm prevention and the development of guardrails for AI.
JOIN US
Matched TAIM controls
Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls
- MAP 4.1 — similarity 0.632, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- GOVERN 6.1 — similarity 0.624, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MEASURE 2.10 — similarity 0.617, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- Alleged deployer
- taly-goody, t.-michael-morgan, rudwin-ayala, morgan-and-morgan, goody-law-group
- Alleged developer
- unspecified-large-language-model-developer
- Alleged harmed parties
- taly-goody, t.-michael-morgan, rudwin-ayala, plaintiffs-in-wyoming-walmart-hoverboard-lawsuit, legal-system, judicial-integrity, clients-of-morgan-and-morgan, clients-of-goody-law-group
Source
Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/960
Data source
Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).
When citing the database as a whole, please use:
McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.
Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide
We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.