Purported DOGE Contract Review Tool Cited in Reports of AI-Driven Misjudgments in VA Budget Cuts
March 18, 2025
Controversies like this underscore the importance of responsible AI governance and safe and secure AI practices. For those interested in shaping Project Cerebellum's efforts towards ensuring trustworthy AI, we invite you to JOIN US here.
This incident serves as an example of how HISPI Project Cerebellum TAIM can Map AI Incidents and work towards preventing harm and enforcing guardrails for AI.
Matched TAIM controls
Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls
- MEASURE 2.6 — similarity 0.678, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MAP 3.2 — similarity 0.669, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MEASURE 1.3 — similarity 0.661, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- Alleged deployer
- department-of-government-efficiency, doge, sahil-lavingia
- Alleged developer
- department-of-government-efficiency, doge, sahil-lavingia
- Alleged harmed parties
- department-of-veterans-affairs-(va), veterans, veterans-receiving-care-through-the-va, va-clinical-and-research-staff, va-contractors
Source
Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/1103
Data source
Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).
When citing the database as a whole, please use:
McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.
Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide
We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.