Purported Fictitious AI-Generated Citations in Supreme Court of Victoria Murder Case Filing Lead to Delay and King's Counsel Apology

August 13, 2025

Australian King's Counsel Rishi Nathwani reportedly submitted allegedly fabricated AI-generated citations in a Supreme Court of Victoria murder case. The errors, discovered by the judge's associates, caused a 24-hour delay. Nathwani took full responsibility and Justice Elliott emphasized the need for independent verification of AI outputs.

This incident underscores the importance of trustworthy and responsible AI governance in court proceedings. Join us at HISPI Project Cerebellum to contribute towards creating safe and secure AI practices by mapping, measuring, and managing incidents like this within our AI incident database.
JOIN US

Matched TAIM controls

Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls

Alleged deployer
rishi-nathwani
Alleged developer
unknown-generative-ai-developer
Alleged harmed parties
accused-minor-in-victoria-state-murder-case, rishi-nathwani, daniel-porceddu, james-elliott, supreme-court-of-victoria, judicial-integrity

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/1184

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.