Purported Fictitious AI-Generated Citations in Supreme Court of Victoria Murder Case Filing Lead to Delay and King's Counsel Apology
August 13, 2025
This incident underscores the importance of trustworthy and responsible AI governance in court proceedings. Join us at HISPI Project Cerebellum to contribute towards creating safe and secure AI practices by mapping, measuring, and managing incidents like this within our AI incident database.
JOIN US
Matched TAIM controls
Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls
- MEASURE 2.6 — similarity 0.625, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MANAGE 4.3 — similarity 0.619, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- MAP 4.1 — similarity 0.616, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →
- Alleged deployer
- rishi-nathwani
- Alleged developer
- unknown-generative-ai-developer
- Alleged harmed parties
- accused-minor-in-victoria-state-murder-case, rishi-nathwani, daniel-porceddu, james-elliott, supreme-court-of-victoria, judicial-integrity
Source
Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/1184
Data source
Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).
When citing the database as a whole, please use:
McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.
Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide
We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.