Purportedly AI-Generated Hunting Regulation Errors Reportedly Lead to Idaho Citation and Multi-State Warnings from Wildlife Agencies

October 15, 2025

An Idaho hunter received a citation for hunting a day early due to relying on an incorrect AI-generated search result regarding state regulations. This information, drawn from a failed proposal, was misleading. Wildlife agencies in Idaho, Wyoming, Illinois, and Maine later issued warnings about similar errors in AI-generated hunting regulation data.

For those interested in shaping the future of trustworthy AI and preventing such incidents, consider joining HISPI Project Cerebellum to Govern, Map, Measure, or Manage AI data related to hunting regulations. JOIN US

Matched TAIM controls

Suggested mapping from embedding similarity (not a formal assessment). Browse all TAIM controls

MAP 4.1 — similarity 0.678, rank 1. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MEASURE 2.6 — similarity 0.674, rank 2. TAIM detail and related incidents →
MAP 1.6 — similarity 0.673, rank 3. TAIM detail and related incidents →

Alleged deployer: google
Alleged developer: google
Alleged harmed parties: wyoming-game-and-fish-department, unnamed-hunter-in-idaho, state-wildlife-agencies, hunters, epistemic-integrity, idaho-fish-and-game

Source

Data from the AI Incident Database (AIID). Cite this incident: https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/1251

Data source

Incident data is from the AI Incident Database (AIID).

When citing the database as a whole, please use:

McGregor, S. (2021) Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-21). Virtual Conference.

Pre-print on arXiv · Database snapshots & citation guide

We use weekly snapshots of the AIID for stable reference. For the official suggested citation of a specific incident, use the “Cite this incident” link on each incident page.